Legal Opinion

McGlue v. Loudon

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 30, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The defendant Charles D. Rood, the appellant, contends, that the fifth paragraph of the final decree is erroneous. It provides “ That the mortgage on personal property of the Quaboag Realty Associates, dated June 25, 1921, given by the defendant Loudon to the defendant Rood to secure the payment of money loaned to the defendant Loudon for which he gave the. defendant Rood a note of the Quaboag Realty Associates for $2,000, was not recorded as required by law and is not a valid mortgage as against the plaintiff. The defendant Rood is ordered to cancel and discharge the same.” The master, to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haskell v. MerrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. Sharpe v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Clark v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  4. Davis v. MazzuchelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Duffy v. CharakSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mason v. WyldeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. In Re KesslerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1950
  3. Maynor v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. In re of Valley City Furniture Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API