Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Tate

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the district court of Cuming county. Tried below before Barnes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

It is not deemed necessary to .notice either of the questions of pleading and practice presented in this case further than to say that by answering, the plaintiff in error waived any error which might have intervened in overruling the demurrer and' motion to strike out a part of the petition; that if there is a cause of action expressed in the petition it is admitted in the answer, and in that case there would be no error on the part of the court in rendering judgment on the pleadings; and that the amendment allowed is clearly within the statute. We are therefore left to the main question: Is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smails v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  2. State v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  3. Franklin v. KelleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Hopkins v. Clayton CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1871

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. County of Platte v. GerrardNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API