Santos v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtLavine, J.
The petitioner, Richard Santos, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the habeas court abused its discretion in denying his petition for certification to appeal because it improperly concluded that (1) the prosecutor in his criminal trial did not knowingly present false or misleading testimony against him, 1 and (2) his trial defense counsel did not render ineffective assistance of counsel. 2 We dismiss the appeal. The following facts,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maner v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- Santos v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017