Legal Opinion
Katzen v. Eight-Twenty Park Avenue Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWasservogel, J.
The gravamen of plaintiff’s amended complaint is that defendant accepted a surrender of a lease made by defendant mortgagor with a tenant, which lease would otherwise have been in effect when the p aintiff-receiver here'n was appointed by reason of a default In the payment of interest due under the terms of the mortgage It is alleged in the complaint and admitted in the answer, that defendant received $11,500 for releasing the representative of the lessee from all liability under the lease, and *626that at the time this was done defendant was in default under the terms of the mortgage and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Prudence Co. v. 160 West Seventy-Third Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- New York Life Insurance v. Fulton Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Ten Park Avenue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by4 opinions
- Poughkeepsie Savings Bank v. R & G Sloane Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- East New York Savings Bank v. 520 West 50th St. Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1994
- Katzen v. Eight-Twenty Park Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Lincoln Savings Bank v. Cluster Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959