Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Harry Hergenrader

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 19, 1976No. 75--1642Published

1DissentWebster, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. There is no doubt that the evidence revealed a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708, which makes it unlawful to take mail matter from a post office or to remove any article or thing from any such mail matter.1 Appellant was not charged under that section, however; he was charged with theft by a postal employee of mail matter “intended to be conveyed by mail” under 18 U.S.C. § 1709. In all of the cases cited in the majority opinion, the decoy mail matter was placed in the normal work flow before being removed therefrom by the postal employee and thus can reasonably be said to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goode v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Montgomery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Kelley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  5. United States v. Beverly R. KentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API