Legal Opinion
Wirtz v. Miller
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided January 24, 1964No. Civ. No. 1416PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARKINS, District Judge:
This action is brought to enjoin defendants from violating the provisions of Sections 15(a) (2) and 15(a) (5) of the-Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.), hereinafter referred to as the Act, and to restrain defendants from withholding payment of minimum wage and overtime *16compensation alleged to be due certain of their employees under the Act.
The cause was heard by the court, sitting without a jury, at Wilson, North Carolina, on September 10, 1963. Before the trial the parties entered into numerous stipulations. There are only three…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Hodges Contracting Company and Kenneth B. HodgesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Goldberg v. CockrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wirtz v. Malthor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Wirtz v. Harper Buffing MacHine CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
- Wirtz v. Malthor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968