Baez v. Padron
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The appellant has the affirmative duty to present the appellate court with an adequate record for appellate review; indeed, this rudimentary principle is inseparably connected to and well grounded in appellate review. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.200(e); see also Seal Prods, v. Mansfield, 705 So.2d 973, 975 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Van Den Boom v. YLB Invs., Inc., 687 So.2d 964, 965 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Graham v. Lomar Indus., 583 So.2d 819, 820 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); McNair v. Pavlakos/McNair Dev. Co., 576 So.2d 933, 933 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Thus, in the absence of an adequate record of the proceedings…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Seal Products v. MansfieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- McNair v. Pavlakos/McNair Development Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Lederman v. ShoreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- van den Boom v. YLB Investments, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.