Legal Opinion

Baez v. Padron

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 19, 1998No. 98-619Published

1Per curiam

The appellant has the affirmative duty to present the appellate court with an adequate record for appellate review; indeed, this rudimentary principle is inseparably connected to and well grounded in appellate review. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.200(e); see also Seal Prods, v. Mansfield, 705 So.2d 973, 975 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Van Den Boom v. YLB Invs., Inc., 687 So.2d 964, 965 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Graham v. Lomar Indus., 583 So.2d 819, 820 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); McNair v. Pavlakos/McNair Dev. Co., 576 So.2d 933, 933 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Thus, in the absence of an adequate record of the proceedings…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Seal Products v. MansfieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. McNair v. Pavlakos/McNair Development Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Lederman v. ShoreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. van den Boom v. YLB Investments, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API