Legal Opinion

William Hicks v. Jack R. Duckworth and Indiana Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 10, 1991No. 89-1672PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

This appeal raises a single issue. Are a defendant’s double jeopardy rights violated when the state successfully pursues an appeal of the dismissal of an habitual offender charge after the defendant has already begun serving a sentence on the underlying crime. Because of the reasons set forth below, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition.

I

Hicks was charged by information with burglary and attempted theft. Arraignment was set for August 23, 1982. The defendant appeared on that date with counsel. Defense counsel advised the court that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. John Robert JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Robert F. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Willie Lee RandelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. State v. GraveleyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. GraveleyMontana Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API