Legal Opinion

Foss v. Mansell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 11, 1979No. 78-2062PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDRY, Judge.

The pivotal question raised by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting *803summary judgment in favor of defendant/appellee based upon the statute of limitations as operating to bar an amendment to plaintiff/appellant’s complaint seeking attorney’s fee. Specifically, we are herein concerned with the concept of the “relation back of amendments” under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.190.

In a prior appeal filed by the defendant, this court reversed a former judgment for the attorney rendered by the circuit court on the ground that where the attorney sued to recover a fee under a written…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Handley v. Anclote Manor FoundationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  2. Aronovitz v. Stein PropertiesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Mansell v. FossDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. RA Jones & Sons, Inc. v. HolmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Kumar Corp. v. Nopal Lines, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Bedell v. MarshallCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1990
  4. City of Orlando v. Central Florida Police Benevolent Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API