Legal Opinion

Burgess v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 22, 1996No. 95-02484Published

1Opinion of the Court

BLUE, Judge.

Kenneth Burgess appeals his convictions and sentences for possession of cocaine and delivery of cocaine. He challenges certain probation conditions and costs. We reverse.

Burgess argues, and the State concedes, that probation conditions 15 and 16 are special conditions that were not orally announced at sentencing. Accordingly, we strike the conditions. See State v. Hart, 668 So.2d 589 (Fla.1996).

Burgess also challenges certain costs that were imposed as part of his sentence. The trial court imposed $270 in various itemized costs. Under Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reyes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. State v. HartSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. State v. MuoioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Phaneuf v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API