Legal Opinion

Estate of Tettemer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 1899No. Appeal, No. 404PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal, No. 404, Jan. T., 1898, by Henry Ritter et al., from decree of O. C. Bucks Co., overruling exceptions to auditor’s report. Exceptions to auditor’s report.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 404, Jan. T., 1898, by Henry Ritter et al., from decree of O. C. Bucks Co., overruling exceptions to auditor’s report. Exceptions to auditor’s report. The auditor reported as follows: The parties agree on the following facts which are admitted in evidence with the same force and effect as if the same had been duly proved before the auditor: 1. Abraham Ritter died on October 29, 1892, unmarried and without issue. 2. Decedent left to survive him one brother, Henry Ritter, and two sisters, Catharine, intermarried with Aaron Oberbeck, and Mary, intermarried with William Ruffner, his…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

There appears to be nothing in any of the five specifications of error before us that requires reversal or modification of the decree from which this appeal was taken. All the questions necessarily involved have been so fully considered and so satisfactorily disposed of by the learned auditor and court below that further discussion of either of them is unnecessary.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rickenbach EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Wood's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Hildebrant v. HildebrantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Bennett's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Hussey v. HusseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API