Legal Opinion

Crow v. McCullen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 9, 1952No. 386PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, C. J.

The Federal Bankruptcy Act declares that a discharge in bankruptcy shall have the effect of releasing the bankrupt from all his provable debts, with certain specific exceptions. Among these are “(2) liabilities . . . for wilful and malicious injuries to the person or property of another,” and debts which “(4) were created by his fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation or defalcation while acting as an officer or in any fiduciary capacity.” 11 U.S.C.A. 35.

The appellant relies upon these exceptions in the' Act as grounds for denying release of the defendants from liability for plaintiff’s debt.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boynton v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Guernsey-Newton Co. v. NapierWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. GolomboskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  4. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Simpson v. . SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Variety Wholesalers, Inc. v. Salem Logistics Traffic Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API