Legal Opinion

Whirley Industries, Inc. v. Segel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1983No. 183PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case of first impression, appellant Whirley Industries, Inc. seeks to recover the increased costs of Workers’ Compensation insurance premiums resulting from benefits paid by Whirley’s insurer to Whirley’s employee, to compensate the employee for injuries sustained due to negligence of the third party tortfeasor. The lower court sustained a demurrer by appellee Leatrice G. Segal, the party whose negligence caused the injuries, and we affirm.

The facts, agreed to by the parties, concern a motor vehicle accident in which William W. Stockdill, Whirley’s employee, was injured. Stockdill, in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Singer v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Dale Manufacturing Co. v. BressiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Avco Corp., Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division of Avco Corp. v. Interstate Southwest, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  3. Erie Castings Company v. Grinding Supply, Inc. And Acme Abrasive CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  4. Higbie Roth Construction Co. v. Houston Shell & Concrete, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Domtar Paper Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API