Legal Opinion

Weathercraft Co. v. Byrd

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 17, 1924No. 15223PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

“A party to a contract who has partly performed his obligations thereunder by rendering valuable services may, where it appears that the opposite party has repudiated and abandoned the contract, or has prevented the former from further performance, waive his right to recover for a breach of the contract, and, by treating the contract as rescinded, maintain an action in quantum meruit against the other contracting party for the value of the services rendered. Beck v. Thompson, 108 Ga. 243 (33 S. E. 894). The doctrine of Blue v. Ford, *37012 Ga. 45, as distinguished and explained in Tumlin v. Bass…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Talbotton Railroad v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Tumlin v. Bass Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Haralson v. SpeerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Beck v. Thompson & Taylor Spice Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Ford v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. R. P. Farnsworth & Co., Inc. v. Tri-State Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Importers Service Corp. v. GP Chemicals Equity, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
  3. R. P. Farnsworth & Co., Inc. v. Tri-State Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API