Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Mather, Walton & Hollowell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 29, 1843PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit. Appeal prom the Mason Circuit. Case 97. The case stated,

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice Ewin®

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mather, Walton & Hollowell filed their declaration in assumpsit, against Proctor, in which there are three counts, for goods, wares and merchandize, sold and delivered, to which the defendant pleaded non-assumpsit, which was joined, and the facts and law of the case submitted, by consent, to the Court for adjudication. Judgment having been rendered for the plaintiffs below, for $855 97, the defendant has appealed to this Court.

It appears that Proctor had purchased from Mather, Waitón & Hollowell, in Philadelphia, goods to a large amount;…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Humphrey v. BurnsideCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API