Legal Opinion
Joachim v. Flanzig
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Leonard B. Austin, J.
Defendants move for an order pursuant to CPLR 3124 and 3126 compelling the plaintiff Stephen Frommer to produce certain documents and to appear for a further deposition and for other discovery including the deposition of Edward Joachim. Frommer cross-moves for summary judgment on his claim that he was a 10% equity partner in the now dissolved law firm of Joachim & Flanzig.
Background
This action arises from the dissolution of the law firm of Joachim & Flanzig (J & F). The parties have stipulated that May 10, 2002 was the date that the partnership…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- De Long v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Matott v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Joachim v. FlanzigNew York Supreme Court, Nassau County · 2004