Legal Opinion
Berman v. Goldstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 9, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The order is affirmed because the evidence discloses no property of the defendant subject to receivership. All concur. (The order denies a motion by the judgment creditor for the appointment of a receiver for the property of the judgment debtor.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Gantz v. T.R.C. Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Smith v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1946