Commonwealth v. Safka
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
PANELLA, J.
The Frye1 test provides that “novel scientific evidence is admissible if the meth*306odology that underlies the evidence has general acceptance in the relevant scientific community.” Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc., 576 Pa. 546, 839 A.2d 1038, 1043-1044 (2003). Appellant, Ryan David Safka, argues, among other things, that the admission of evidence as to the speed of his vehicle based solely on the data retrieved from his vehicle’s Event Data Recorder (“EDR”) fails the Frye test. Whether EDR data may be used to establish a vehicle’s speed is an issue of first impression in this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. HarrellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Bachman v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Commonwealth v. FoleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Com. v. Cramer, R., IIISuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Com. v. Bonnett, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Commonwealth v. NevelsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. SafkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. PowellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.