Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Shively

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 8, 2009No. 1D08-5402PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellants seek review of the trial court’s order denying their specific performance count based on the determination that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. Section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes (2008), requires an action for specific performance of a contract be brought within one year, and the statute of limitations begins to run on the date the contract is breached. Cent. Nat’l Bank of Miami v. Centr. Bancorp, Inc., 411 So.2d 358, 362 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1982); see also City of Orlando v. Williams, 493 So.2d 15, 16 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).

Appellants concede a breach occurred in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rabon v. Inn of Lake City, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. CENTRAK NAT. BANK OF MIAMI v. Central Bancorp., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. City of Orlando v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Standard Jury Instructions—Contract & Business CasesSupreme Court of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API