Legal Opinion

Daniella Slater v. Shannon Deasey

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 3, 2019No. 17-56708PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIELLA SLATER; DAMIEN SLATER, No. 17-56708 individually and as successors in interest, by and through their D.C. No. Guardian ad Litem Sandra Salazar; 5:16-cv-01103- TINA SLATER; DAVID BOUCHARD, JFW-KK individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SHANNON DEASEY, Deputy; previously erroneously named as Shandon Deasey; PETER GENTRY, Deputy; GARY BRANDT, Deputy; MIKE RUDE, Sgt.; COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; DOES, 1–10, Inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. 2 SLATER V. DEASEY DANIELLA SLATER; DAMIEN SLATER, No. 17-56751 individually and as…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Mullenix v. LunaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Brosseau v. HaugenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. White v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Andrich v. KostasDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  2. Baker v. SnowDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  3. Dlubak Glass Company v. CabreraDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  4. Koley v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  5. Nevarez v. Mesa, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API