Legal Opinion

Harris v. Neal

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1908No. Docket No. 57PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Livingston; Miner, J. Case by Celia Harris against James Neal for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

Plaintiff alleges that she was assaulted and raped by defendant. She brought this suit to recover compensation. Her testimony supported her claim. Defendant denied having had any intercourse with plaintiff and he introduced testimony tending to prove an alibi. The issue was submitted to a jury who rendered a verdict in plaintiff’s favor. Defendant seeks a reversal. Defendant was permitted to introduce testimony tending to prove that plaintiff had a bad reputation for chastity. The trial court held that this testimony could be used *58only for the purpose of mitigating damages. Defendant,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Leonard v. PopeMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Ives v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Knickerbocker v. WorthingMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People v. RynoMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McNabb v. Green Real Estate Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. DawseyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Della Pella v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. People v. DawseyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. MitchellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API