Legal Opinion · Dissent

Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. Russell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 12, 1990No. 89-0286Published

1DissentAnstead, Judge

I think the law of the case precluded the trial court from reassessing the amount of attorney’s fees awarded herein. In the pri- or appeal, Glens Falls successfully argued that the trial court’s judgment on the amount of insurance available to the insured should be reduced by some $400,-000.00. Although a cross-appeal was filed by the insured, no issue was raised concerning the award to the insured of attorney’s fees in the amount of $9,375.00. That award, of course, was made for the insured’s attorney’s efforts in securing the judgment on insurance coverage against Glens Falls. Upon remand…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Marine Midland Bank Central v. CoteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Tillman v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API