Clary v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
— Appellant was prosecuted under an indictment containing two counts, one charging forgery and the other passing a forged instrument. As appellant was adjudged guilty of forgery, it is unnecessary to discuss those grounds relating to the charge on passing a forged instrument.
There was no error in overruling the application for a continuance as qualified by the court, the court stating that the process had been issued for the witness at the preceding term of court and the witness had failed to appear, and the application for a continuance on account of this witness then acted on,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Probest v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
3Cited by14 opinions
- Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Grigsby v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Carlile v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Medrano v. City of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.