Legal Opinion
Roark v. Prideaux
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 10, 1926No. 11533PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.
B. P.. Roark, joined by his sons, O. C. and H. M. Roark, and his daughter, Mary F. Roark, instituted this suit against F. A. Prideaux and. his four brothers, G. G., E. R., H. O., and J. K. Pri-deaux, and the Motor Supply Company, in the district court of Young county, to recover the sum of $15,000 paid by B. P. Roark for 150 shares of stock in the Motor Supply Company, a corporation of which said five brothers were the owners, directors, and stockholders at the time of the sale of the stock. •
The plaintiffs alleged that they were induced to purchase the stock by means of certain false and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Day Land & Cattle Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- George v. HesseTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Parks v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- City of Austin v. Austin City Cemetery Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1894
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Prideaux v. RoarkTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Wood v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- King v. CliettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Reynolds Brothers, Incorporated v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Sivalls Motor Co. v. ChastainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.