Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 13, 1993No. 23966PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The State appeals a new trial granted to Charlie Dorn Smith (Smith) on his conviction for accessory before the fact of murder. Smith appeals his conviction for solicitation. We affirm the grant of a new trial and reverse the solicitation conviction.

Smith was a co-defendant of Roger Dewitt (Bill) Prince. See State v. Prince, 447 S.E. (2d) 177 (S.C.S.St. 1993).

FACTS

The reader is referred to our opinion in State v. Prince, supra, for a review of all the evidence. Smith, Prince, and Me- Cray were tried jointly for the murder of Mr. Graham and related crimes. The relevant admissible facts against…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. FurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. PrinceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. MasseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. PrinceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Sellers v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API