Legal Opinion
Stasi v. Markham
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 10, 1946No. Civil Action No. 5196PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
This is an action brought under the Trading with the Enemy Act of October 6, 1917, 40 Stat. 411, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, §§ 1-31, as amended, for the recovery from the Alien Property Custodian of money claimed to be owed to the plaintiff by an Italian Company, the American assets of which have been vested by the Custodian.
Pursuant to the above statute (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the property of the Italia Societa Anónima Di Navigazione, also known as the Italian Lines, was seized by the Alien Property Custodian by Vesting Order 182, dated September 28, 1942.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cabell v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Synthetic Patents Co. v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Norris v. BergdollDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lord Day & Lord v. Socialist Republic of VietnamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001