Legal Opinion
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes division/ibt v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, a D.C. Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 16, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2016-1109PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting Dependant’s Motion to Dismiss, Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
Rudolph Contreras, United States District Judge
1. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT and the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen (collectively “the Unions”) seek a preliminary injunction against Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”), alleging that it unilaterally implemented new rules that changed working conditions in violation of the statutory “status quo” period required by 45 U.S.C. § 156. See Am. Compl., at…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bhd. of R.R. Signalmen v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- American Train Dispatchers Association v. National Railway Labor ConferenceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Association of Flight Attendants-Cwa, Afl-Cio v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2020
- Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.