Legal Opinion

State v. Bartone, 22920 (1-16-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 2009No. 22920PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} The State of Ohio appeals from an order suppressing evidence. We will reverse.

I

{¶ 2} The trial court spelled out the facts in its suppression order. These facts find ample support in the record, and we adopt them as our own narration of the facts.

{¶ 3} "On Sunday, April 13, 2008, Officer Imwalle of the Dayton Police Department was on routine patrol in a marked cruiser in the old North Dayton neighborhood. Officer Imwalle has been employed by the Dayton Police Department for six years. She was a single person crew on that date and was then aware of some previous reports of illegal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. LowmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State v. SandersOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RastbichlerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. KellyOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. Davidson, 22442 (5-15-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API