Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gregg v. the State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 10, 2015No. A14A2065Published

1DissentAndrews, Presiding Judge

We are required to review the denial of Sharon Diane Gregg’s pretrial motion to compel compliance with a subpoena duces tecum “only for an abuse of discretion.” Lovell v. Ga. Trust Bank, 318 Ga. App. 860, 862 (1) (734 SE2d 847) (2012). Because I conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Gregg’s pretrial motion to compel, I respectfully dissent.

1. First, the nature of the information Gregg seeks from the pharmacy is to challenge a witness’ credibility; it is not relevant to Gregg’s guilt or innocence. See Tuttle v. State, 232 Ga. App. 530, 532-533 (2) (d) (502 SE2d…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Castell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Price v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  3. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  4. Eason v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  5. State v. LuciousSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API