Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1988No. 53262PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was convicted of the sale of a controlled substance. On May 4, 1984, he received a suspended imposition of sentence and five years’ probation. Movant’s probation was revoked on June 7, 1985, and he was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. The court did not grant movant credit for time spent on probation to decrease his ten-year sentence.

Movant, in his 27.26 action, asserts this failure to grant credit is a violation of the equal protection clause because the existing statutes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Woodmansee v. AppelquistSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. White v. WyrickDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Milligan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Wuebbels v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API