Legal Opinion
Babcock v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Action upon an accident insurance policy.
1Opinion of the CourtForbes, J.
This is an action on an accident insurance policy. The plaintiff was injured at Buffalo, N. Y. He returned home on or about the 26th day of September, 1899, the day of the accident. On the 11th day of October, 1899, he notified the defendant company that he had been injured. The defendant forwarded blank-proofs, which were filled out and sworn to, with the certificate of a physician attached thereto, showing the particulars of the accident; the place at which the injuries were received, and the extent of those injuries discovered at that time. These proofs were returned to defendant. After a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gibson Electric Co. v. Liverpooland London & Globe InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Wehle v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Martin v. Manufacturers' Accident Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Walker v. Phœnix Insurance Co. of HartfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Meech v. National Accident SocietyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- A. Z. A. Realty Corp. v. Harrigan's Cafe, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1920