Legal Opinion

Interstate Department Stores, Inc. v. Henry

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Sec. 1 (9), ch. 469, Laws of 1933, provides :

“. . . But the aggrieved taxpayer shall pay the tax as and when due and if paid under protest . . . sue the state treasurer in an action at law to recover the tax so paid. . .

The contention that sub. (9) was erased from the statutes by the ruling in Ed. Schuster & Co. v. Henry, 218 Wis. 506, 261 N. W. 20, declaring taxation under that chapter.and section to be unconstitutional, is not sustained. Sub. (9) contains a complete method for the restoration to a taxpayer of his property if he is in a position to make the demand. Tt is a complete enactment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Ward v. Board of Commr's of Love Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Beck v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Ed. Schuster & Co. v. HenryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Union Bag & Paper Corp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. City of La CrosseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  2. Brink v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  3. Butcher v. Ameritech Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  4. MBS-Certified Public Accountants, LLC v. Wisconsin Bell Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API