Legal Opinion

Waters v. Waters

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided March 15, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to sequestrate the property of the defendant and for a receiver.

1Opinion of the Court

Titus, Ch. J.

This matter is brought before the court by an order to show cause, by the plaintiff, why the property of the defendant should not be sequestered and a receiver of the rents and profits appointed, and by him paid over to the plaintiff and applied in satisfaction of a decree of divorce granted the plaintiff against the defendant, allowing alimony to her.

It appears that the parties, who were husband and wife, were divorced for the adultery of the defendant, and in the decree the defendant was ordered to pay forty-six dollars and *520forty-six cents costs, and eight dollars a week from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Market National Bank v. Pacific National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Hallett v. RightersNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Richardson v. BatesNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Soulden v. CookNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  5. Skinner v. DaytonNew York Court of Chancery · 1821

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pool v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Dennin v. DuffyNew York Supreme Court · 1914
  3. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API