Legal Opinion

Davis v. Latham-Bradshaw Cotton Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WalKee, J.,

after stating tbe case, delivers tbe opinion of tbe Court: Tbe above statement of tbe facts fairly presents tbe important question we must deal with in this case.

Tbe language of tbe tariff and tbe rules we have cited preclude tbe idea or inference tbat any cotton other than tbat originating at a station on tbe Southern Railway, and named in tbe tariff, and which is tbe point of origin, should be entitled to concentration and reshipment privileges.

¥e are of tbe opinion tbat tbe legal meaning, under tbe tariff, of tbe words “originating at” and “point of origin” is tbat of tbe first…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. HefleySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HaroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peterson v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API