Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 29, 1999No. 98-3579PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Affirmed. See Rollinson v. State, 748 So.2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Young v. State, 719 So.2d 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 727 So.2d 915 (Fla.1999); State v. Vixamar, 687 So.2d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (holding no constitutional right to enforce plea bargain); Winokur v. State, 605 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (holding that a defendant is not constitutionally entitled to a plea bargain); Jesus v. State, 565 So.2d 1361, 1365 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (“[I]f sentence is within the limits prescribed by the Legislature, we have no jurisdiction to interfere.”) (quoting Banks v. State,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Banks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Clark v. NattLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. State v. VixamarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Winokur v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Terranova v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Baez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API