Legal Opinion
T. P. Laboratories, Inc. v. Huge
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 19, 1961No. Civ. A. 12527PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.
The plaintiff has brought suit against Gerald W. Huge (Huge) and the Dental Corporation of America for alleged infringement of certain letters patent own-, ed by plaintiff. Individual defendant Huge has filed five motions, four of which can be disposed of summarily. Only the first motion will require extended discussion. A hearing was had on the motions; certain tentative rulings were indicated by the court, and the plaintiff was given an opportunity thereafter to take the deposition of defendant Huge.
The second motion to dismiss or in the alternative to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Revocation of Ancillary Letters Testamentary of the Estate of NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. SwentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- Jenkins v. North Shore Dye House, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Winans v. WinansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- White v. TennantWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shepard v. Keystone InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1990
- Boer v. University Specialty HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Boer v. University Specialty HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011