Legal Opinion

Boakye-Yiadom v. Roosevelt Union Free School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*929Education Law § 3813 (1) provides in pertinent part: “No action . . . involving the rights or interests of any district . . . shall be prosecuted or maintained against any school district, board of education ... or any officer of a school district [or] board of education . . . unless it shall appear by and as an allegation in the complaint . . . that a written verified claim upon which such action ... is founded was presented to the governing body of said district or school within three months after the accrual of such claim, and that the officer or body having the power to adjust or pay said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. H. Verby Co. v. Carle Place Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Lenz Hardware, Inc. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Clune v. Garden City Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Power Cooling, Inc. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boakye-Yiadom v. Roosevelt Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API