State v. Cone

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Michael Cone appeals a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of aggravated assault. Cone argues the district court erred in denying his requested remedy for a discovery violation, the court erred in admitting evidence of his prior criminal convictions, the State committed prosecutorial misconduct and the court erred in allowing the State to comment on attorney-client privilege. We affirm the judgment.

I

[¶ 2] In July 2012, the State charged Cone with aggravated assault and with, felonious restraint, alleging he punched the complainant in the face and…