Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Steffan v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Cebtioeabi issued out of the Supreme Court and attested on the 5th day of April, 1895, directed to Joseph Murray and others, composing the board of commissioners of excise of the city and county of New York, directing them to certify and return to the office of the clerk of the county of New York all and singular their proceedings in relation to the removal of the relator from the office of an inspector of excise for the city of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

Rumsey, J.:

Up to the time of his discharge complained of, the relator was an -excise inspector, having been appointed' in 1889. On the 28th day ■of February, 1895, the board of commissioners of excise at a meeting resolved'that the clerk should be and was directed to request the resignation of the inspectors, among whom was the relhtor. It was further resolved at the same time that in case of the refusal of ■any of them to resign as requested, by four o’clock in the after- , noon of that day,' each one who did not resign was dismissed from the service of the. department. A notice of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gregory v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. People Ex Rel. Fonda v. . MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abrams v. HortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Mack v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1902
  3. People ex rel. Lion v. MurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API