Legal Opinion

Brickell v. McCaskill

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 2, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

The defendants in error brought an action against Maude E. Brickell, Frank Clark and William B. Brickell as “Executors of the Estate” of Mary Brickell, deceased.

No exception being taken to the description of the capacity in which the defendants were sued it will be treated as an action against them in their representative capacity as executors of the will of Mrs. Brickell.

The action rested upon a quantum meruit for professional services alleged to have been rendered by the plaintiffs in part during the lifetime of Mrs. Brickell, and completed after her death with the knowledge and consent of-…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. RentzSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  4. Tucker v. GraceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  5. Kelly v. Odum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Concrete Sciences, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Estate of Paine v. GarnettSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. First Trust & Savings Bank v. SoutherlandSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. In re Engle-RelatedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. State Bank of Orlando & Trust Co. v. Cummer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API