Legal Opinion

Tom Houlihan Men's Wear v. Wilkerson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1966No. 32266PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Commissioner.

This is a garnishment action against the defendant’s employer in aid of execution. The decisive issue is whether the employer is liable as garnishee when it had already paid its employee more money, than he had earned. The trial court gave plaintiff a judgment against the employer-garnishee, and it appeals. The case was tried without a jury on these stipulated facts:

The plaintiff had gotten a $150 consent judgment on its account against defendant John Wilkerson, who worked as an insurance salesman for the garnishee on a commission basis. For some time the garnishee had…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gruenewaelder v. WintermannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. Pashalian v. Big-4 Chevrolet CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Nacy v. LepageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Bommer v. StedelinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Bambrick v. Bambrick Bros. Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bagnell Investment Co. v. LutenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. Eagle Bank & Trust Co. Ex Rel. Roderman v. CorcoranSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Landmark Bank of Ladue v. General Grocer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Grimm v. SinnettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Butler v. Physicians Planning Service Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API