Legal Opinion

United States v. LaPant

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 28, 2022No. 2:16-cv-01498Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 United States of America, No. 2:16-cv-01498-KJM-DB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 Roger L. LaPant, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 In this Clean Water Act enforcement action, the United States alleged that Goose Pond 18 | Ag, Inc. illegally plowed and leveled protected wetlands. The claims were settled by consent 19 | decree. Since then, Goose Pond conveyed the land to Duarte Nursery, Inc. Duarte has moved to 20 | intervene, and asks the court to enforce its rights under the consent decree. That claim,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API