Legal Opinion

Carr v. Axelrod

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 15, 1992No. 92 Civ. 0305 (GLG), 92 Civ. 0509 (GLG)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOETTEL, District Judge:

While Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973), has been reaffirmed, the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 2791, 120 L.Ed.2d 674 (1992), has been simply to shift the battlegrounds for the abortion wars to the states who are now vested with the limited power to regulate abortions. A novel front has opened up in New York, a state which has relatively few restrictions upon abortion, where the skirmish concerns the application of consumer protection laws to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re NVR L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
  2. United Mutual Houses, L.P. v. AndujarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Pitts v. Ohio Department of Taxation (In Re Pitts)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
  4. Toback v. City of Long BeachDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  5. Wallace v. WiedenbeckDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API