Legal Opinion

Stasiak v. Loomis Armored, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 22, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 87-CV-70545-DTPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION DENYING DEFENDANT TRUCK DRIVERS LOCAL UNION NO. 299’S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S JURY DEMAND

DUGGAN, District Judge.

The Plaintiff brought this action against his former employer, Loomis Armored, Inc., and its exclusive bargaining agent, Truck Drivers Local Union No. 299 (“Union”), alleging breach of duty of fair representation and wrongful discharge in breach of a collective bargaining agreement, and requesting a jury trial. This matter is now before the Court on the Union’s Motion to Strike the Plaintiff’s Jury Demand. Defendant Loomis concurred in the Union’s motion. The Union…

2Cases cited14 opinions

Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Vineyard v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988