Legal Opinion

Arbid v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 3, 2012No. 09-73211PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Khalil-Salim Arbid (“Arbid”), a native and citizen of Lebanon, petitions for review of a decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). The BIA upheld the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination that Arbid had committed a particularly serious crime, rendering him ineligible for asylum or withholding of removal. The BIA also affirmed the IJ’s finding that conditions had changed in Lebanon such that it was no longer more likely than not that Arbid would be tortured upon his return. Arbid argues that his mail fraud conviction was not a particularly serious crime and that it is…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Li Chen Zheng, AKA Zheng Li Chen v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Singh v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. FRENTESCUBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1982
  5. Xiao Fei Zheng v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arbid v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Roberto Blandino-Medina v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Khalil-Salim Arbid v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API