Eagleton v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The question submitted for decision is wheth- • er a member of the Board of Education of St. Louis can be removed during his succeeding term because of misconduct committed during his preceding term.
Appellant, as President of the Board, instituted this proceeding to remove respondent from membership on such board. He charges that respondent became interested in a contract with the board in that, as a representative of a bond house, he sold bonds to the Superintendent of Instruction for the investment of school funds which the Superintendent was holding as trustee and that such sale was in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Attorney General v. TuftsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- State Upon the Information of McKittrick v. WymoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. HastySupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- State Ex Inf. Barrett v. ImhoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
- In Re Clark v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Flarsheim v. Twenty Five Thirty Two Broadway Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Fleming v. Moore Brothers Realty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- City of Raytown v. DanforthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- International Business MacHines Corp. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Veal v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.