Schroder v. Clinton
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Appellants are farmers or ranchers who live and work within the territorial boundaries of the Tenth Circuit and who seek declaratory and injunctive relief against the President of the United States, the United States Secretary of Agriculture, the United States Secretary of the Treasury, and the United States of America (collectively, “Appellees”). Appellants seek, in essence, an order requiring Appel-lees and their agents to maintain market conditions favorable to small farmers. The district court dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, writing, “The Complaint…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sarei v. Rio Tinto PLC.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- United States v. PlottsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Kerr v. PolisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Ysais v. State of NM Judicial StandardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Kerr v. HickenlooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.