Pine v. Anderson

The Chief-Justice delivered the opinion of the court:

This was an action for unlawful detainer of certain property in the city of Pensacola. On the trial of the cause there was a verdict for the plaintiffs. Defendant moved fora new trial upon the following grounds:

1. That the verdict is contrary to law.

2. Contrary to the evidence.

3. The court erred in its charges to the jury.

A new trial was refused and the defendant excepted, and took his appeal to this court.

There is no bill of exceptions in the case. There is a paper signed by the respective counsel which purports to set forth the evidence…