Commonwealth v. Knowles
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtMassing, J.
*1158*618This appeal requires us to apply the rule prohibiting cross-examination by innuendo, most recently enunciated in Commonwealth v. Peck, 86 Mass. App. Ct. 34, 12 N.E.3d 1020 (2014) ( Peck ), to the cross-examination of three defense witnesses: an expert witness, a lay witness, and the defendant himself.
A jury in the Central Division of the Boston Municipal Court Department found the defendant guilty of two counts of unlawful possession of a loaded firearm in violation of G. L. c. 269, § 10(a ), (n ). The primary issues at trial were whether the defendant knowingly possessed the two firearms…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Commonwealth v. FlebotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. TavaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- United States v. Herman Tyrone HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Commonwealth v. AlphasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Commonwealth v. Joseph PiardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2025
- Commonwealth v. NunezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018