Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Knowles

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 3, 2017No. 16–P–1409PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMassing, J.

*1158*618This appeal requires us to apply the rule prohibiting cross-examination by innuendo, most recently enunciated in Commonwealth v. Peck, 86 Mass. App. Ct. 34, 12 N.E.3d 1020 (2014) ( Peck ), to the cross-examination of three defense witnesses: an expert witness, a lay witness, and the defendant himself.

A jury in the Central Division of the Boston Municipal Court Department found the defendant guilty of two counts of unlawful possession of a loaded firearm in violation of G. L. c. 269, § 10(a ), (n ). The primary issues at trial were whether the defendant knowingly possessed the two firearms…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Commonwealth v. FlebotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. TavaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. United States v. Herman Tyrone HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. AlphasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  2. Commonwealth v. Joseph PiardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2025
  3. Commonwealth v. NunezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API