Legal Opinion

Sedonic v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 13, 1983No. Appeals, Nos. 2760 C.D. 1981, 2761 C.D. 1981, 2762 C.D. 1981 and 2790 C.D. 1981Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

We have consolidated for disposition the appeals of four unemployment compensation claimants from separate orders of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (board) upholding a referee’s decision that the benefits payable to the claimants during the week of December 21 to December 27 should be reduced by the amount of vacation pay received by the petitioners for that week. The referee’s decision was based on Section 404(d) (ii) of the Act,1 43 P.S. §804 (d) (ii) which provides pertinently:(d) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section each eligible…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. United States Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Humanic v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Libbey-Owens-Ford Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API